News
Contact Us
Popular search
 China Mould maker china injection mold factory, mold china.files/iso.jpg)
MFA and MFV
Definition
Here we present two simple yet
important design and process parameters: melt-front
velocity (MFV) and
melt-front area (MFA). As its name suggests, melt-front velocity is
the
melt-front advancement speed. Melt-front area is defined as the
cross-sectional area of
the advancing melt front: either the length of the
melt front multiplied by the thickness of
the part (see the diagram below),
the cross-sectional area of the runner, or a sum of both,
if the melt is
flowing in both places. At any time, the product of local MFV and MFA
along
all moving fronts is equal to the volumetric flow rate
FIGURE 1. Melt-front velocity and melt-front area. Note that a constant
volumetric flow rate does not
necessarily guarantee a constant velocity at
the advancing melt front, due to the variable cavity geometry
and filling
pattern. With a variable MFV, the material element (shown in square) will
stretch differently,
resulting in differential molecular and fiber
orientations.
Varying MFV
For any mold that has a complex cavity
geometry, a constant ram speed (or, equivalently, a constant
volumetric flow
rate) does not necessarily guarantee a constant velocity at the advancing melt
front.
Whenever the cross-sectional area of the cavity varies, part of the
cavity may fill faster than other
areas. The figure above shows an example
where the MFV increases around the insert, even though
the volumetric flow
rate is constant. This creates high stress and orientation along the two sides
of
the insert and potentially results in differential shrinkage and part
warpage.
Equation
The relationship of volumetric flow rate, MFA,
and an averaged MFV can be expressed as:
How flow dynamics affect
orientation
During the filling stage of the injection molding process,
the polymer molecules and reinforcing
fibers (for fiber-filled polymers) will
orient in a direction influenced by the shear flow. Since the
melt is usually
injected into a cold mold, most of the orientation in the vicinity of the part
surface is
almost instantaneously frozen-in, as illustrated below. The state
of molecular and fiber orientation
depends on the flow dynamics of the melt
front and the evolution of fiber orientation. At the melt
front, a
combination of shear and extensional flows continuously force the fluid elements
from the
center core to the mold wall, a phenomenon commonly referred to as
the “Fountain flow.” Fountain
flow behavior greatly influences the
molecular/fiber orientations, especially in areas close to the
part
surfaces.
FIGURE 2. Fiber orientations on the part surface and in the center mid-plane
of the part
Why constant MFV is important
The dynamics of the melt front
are perhaps the least well understood aspect of mold filling, and are
beyond
the scope of this design guide. However, it is well recognized that the higher
the velocity at
the melt front, the higher the surface stress and the degree
of molecular and fiber orientation.
Variable orientation within the part, as
a result of variable velocity at the melt front during filling,leads to
differential shrinkage and, thus, part warpage. Therefore, it is desirable to
maintain a
constant velocity at the melt front to generate uniform molecular
and fiber orientation throughout
the part.
Flow
balance
MFV and MFA are important design parameters, especially for
balancing the flow during cavity
filling. For example, MFA can be used as an
index to quantitatively compare the degree of flow
balance. More
specifically, when the flow is unbalanced, portions of the melt front reach the
end of
the cavity while other portions are still moving. The melt-front area
changes abruptly whenever
such an unbalanced situation occurs. On the other
hand, balanced flow generally has a minimum
variation of melt-front area in
the cavity. For a given complex part geometry, you can determine
the
optimized gate location by minimizing the variation of MFA in the cavity.
As an example, the
diagram below shows the MFAs that correspond to a balanced
and an unbalanced filling pattern.
FIGURE 3. a) Variation of MFA with balanced and unbalanced flows, and (b) the
corresponding filling
patterns.
|
|
|